196 Grayson Point, Blue Ridge, GA 30513 STR Pro Forma

Understanding this property snapshot

This short-term rental property review covers 196 Grayson Point, Blue Ridge, GA 30513. The 2026 tracker records a purchase-price field of $660,000 and projected annual income of $660,000. These figures describe the source snapshot, rather than a verified current listing or an operating statement. The recorded screening status is “04 - Video Complete (Ready To Pair)”.

Read the price, income and screening status together. A revenue projection can help explain why a property entered the acquisition pipeline, but it does not establish how much an owner would keep after expenses and financing. This page preserves the available source fields and identifies the parts of the pro forma that cannot be reconstructed from this tab.

The address places this record in Blue Ridge, GA. The linked market directory lets you compare other addresses in the same tracker. It is a collection of screened properties, rather than a claim that this address is the best STR investment in the market.

The property fields recorded for this address are Bedrooms: 4; Bathrooms: 4; Square footage: 2,592; Furnishing: This property is furnished; Deal type: Conventional. These details describe the tracked property, but do not establish guest capacity, rental demand or an independently verified condition report.

Why this deal is in this screening group

196 Grayson Point, Blue Ridge, GA 30513 is grouped with good candidates because the tracker records “04 - Video Complete (Ready To Pair)”. The good-candidate group includes properties that advanced into secondary review, pairing, signatures, contract or closing. That progress is evidence of a screening stage; it is not evidence of a completed rental season or a guaranteed return.

The next useful comparison is between the recorded purchase price, the income assumption and a complete acquisition budget. A candidate can still require further review if the price changes, financing terms differ or expenses are missing. Keep the favorable screening classification separate from a final decision to buy.

Reading the reviewer figures for this address

Alongside the headline projected annual income of $660,000, this row records a reviewer income assumption of $166k and a reviewer cash-on-cash field of 10.59%. These are separate source fields, not amounts calculated by this page. Their presence makes it possible to see the reviewer figures without replacing the original headline projection.

The tab does not establish whether these fields share the same expense, debt or cash-invested assumptions. Keep each field attached to its source context when comparing the deal. A difference between the headline and reviewer fields should be reconciled in the full underwriting rather than silently averaged or treated as an actual result.

Projected income versus money you keep

The projected annual income field for this address is $660,000. A projection is an estimate in the tracker, rather than verified bookings, collected rent or net cash flow. The tab does not supply a supporting rental calendar, occupancy model or nightly-rate breakdown for this field. Those assumptions cannot be independently reproduced on this page.

Revenue and net income answer different questions. Operating costs reduce revenue before financing is considered; debt payments then affect the cash left to an owner. Because the complete cost and financing inputs are unavailable here, this snapshot does not calculate net operating income, monthly cash flow or a supported cash-on-cash return.

Where numeric reviewer fields are available, they appear separately from the headline figures. A reviewer income assumption may differ from projected annual income. A recorded cash-on-cash field may indicate the reviewer’s assessment, but without its full calculation basis it should not be treated as a verified or independently reproducible result.

What a complete pro forma would still need

The purchase-price field of $660,000 is only one input to the acquisition model. The source tab does not establish the total cash required for closing, financing, furnishings, setup or reserves. Those missing figures prevent this page from presenting a complete upfront investment total.

A complete operating model would also need an itemized expense schedule and documented financing terms. This snapshot leaves unsupported amounts unfilled. It does not substitute estimates from another address, a market average or a linked workbook for the property’s own inputs.

The same limitation applies to downside analysis. This tab does not provide a reproducible scenario showing what happens when income falls or costs rise. A label of good, not great or terrible should therefore be read as the recorded screening outcome, rather than a substitute for a complete base case and downside model.

How to use this record in a deal review

Start with the exact address and source row, then confirm that the status and price refer to the version of the deal being evaluated. The date-added field is a tracker entry date; it does not necessarily identify the latest underwriting review. If there are multiple tracker entries for this address, the history table retains their dates, statuses and headline financial fields.

Next, reconcile projected income with any separate reviewer income field. Identify what is supplied, what differs and what remains unknown. Review the compliance field separately from the financial figures, because an income projection does not establish that short-term rental use is permitted.

Finally, assemble the missing expense, debt and cash-required inputs before judging the return. This page is useful for understanding why the property appeared in the pipeline and how it was screened. It is not a completed investment recommendation or evidence of realized client profits.

Questions about this property pro forma

Is this actual STR performance? No. The income field is a source projection. This tab does not establish realized rental revenue, expenses or owner distributions for this address.

Does the deal label prove the return? No. The label follows the recorded screening status. Advanced candidates, unresolved deals and rejected deals have different review histories, but none of those labels independently verifies an investment return.

Can I calculate cash-on-cash return from this page? The source does not provide the full annual cash flow and cash-invested inputs needed to reproduce that calculation. Any numeric reviewer field is presented as a recorded field with an unconfirmed basis.

Where do the numbers come from? Only the supplied 2026 tracker tab. Other tabs and linked pro forma workbooks were not used. The source row appears at the bottom so this snapshot can be reconciled with its recorded entry.