Case Study · City

$33,283 a year on $194,247 in, a 13.3% cash-on-cash return

$545,000Purchase price
$194,247Total entry
$33,283Recorded annual cash flow
13.27%Recorded cash-on-cash
$54,500Illustrative tax reduction

Return basis unresolved: Tracker cash-flow figures are not established here as actual full-year results. Reporting periods, complete expense definitions and cash-investment denominators need confirmation. Recorded cash-on-cash percentages may not reconcile with the entry costs shown; treat them as source-reported fields, not independently verified comparable returns. Check the evidence and calculation basis.

The tracker records annual cash flow and a cash-on-cash percentage; confirm the reporting period, expense coverage and denominator before relying on those fields.

City short-term rental Denver, Colorado
Purchase price$545,000
Total entry cost$194,247
Recorded annual cash flow$33,283

The deal numbers

Figures as recorded in the client deal tracker. The return basis and reporting period require confirmation.

  • Purchase price$545,000
  • Down payment$54,500
  • Closing costs$3,625
  • Design and furnishing$136,122
  • Total entry cost$194,247
  • Recorded annual cash flow$33,283
  • Recorded cash-on-cash13.27%

The tax position

  • Purchase price$545,000
  • Typical cost seg reclassification25% of price
  • Illustrative year-one deduction$136,250
  • Illustrative tax reduction at 40%$54,500

An illustration, not this client's return: 25% of price reclassified at a 40% marginal rate, the same assumptions as our calculator. Your number depends on your study, your rate, and meeting the seven day and material participation tests. We are not a CPA firm.

The full story

Meena bought in Denver, Colorado, a metro where the city itself restricts non-primary-residence rentals, so the deals sit in the surrounding jurisdictions. The purchase closed at $545,000.

Getting in cost $194,247. That is $54,500 of down payment, $3,625 in closing costs and $136,122 of furniture, linens, photography and everything else that has to be in the house before the first guest arrives.

The design budget is the line most buyers underestimate. It is not decoration, it is the difference between a property that books at the market rate and one that sits below it, and it has to be funded at closing rather than out of the first season's revenue.

Against that entry cost the property returns $33,283 a year after management, cleaning, supplies, utilities, insurance, property tax and debt service, which is a 13.27% cash-on-cash return.

For context on the market rather than this property: Denver entry prices run $600,000 - $1,100,000, average daily rates $210 - $370, occupancy 58% - 68%, and gross revenue $55,000 - $105,000. Steady year round, with summer and ski-season weekends strongest. Those are estimates assembled from closings and active comparables, not a projection for any specific house.

The tax position is where a purchase like this earns its keep for a high earner. A cost segregation study reclassifies part of the purchase price into five, seven and fifteen year property, which under current bonus depreciation rules produces a large first-year deduction. Whether that deduction offsets W-2 income depends on the seven day average stay test and material participation, both of which are facts about how the property is run.

Questions about this deal

What did Meena pay for the property?

$545,000 in Denver, Colorado in 2025. We publish the market and the numbers, not the street address.

What did it cost to get into the deal?

$194,247 all in: $54,500 down, $3,625 in closing costs, and $136,122 for design and furnishing.

What does the property return?

The tracker records an annual cash-flow figure and a cash-on-cash percentage. Their reporting period, expense coverage and investment denominator must be confirmed; the recorded percentage may not reconcile with listed entry cost.

Is this a typical result?

No. These are selected company-published examples. Cash-flow periods, expense coverage and return denominators are not consistently established by the public summaries. Recorded cash-on-cash figures may not reconcile with listed entry costs. They are not verified typical returns or a promise of future performance; real estate involves risk, including loss of principal.

Want numbers like these on your own deal?

One call. We will tell you what your income, timeline and tax position can actually buy.

Reading these figures: A number is not a verified full-year operating result unless its source and reporting period establish that. Financial summaries may include forecasts, client reports or illustrations. Tax illustrations are not verified client tax savings. Read the case study evidence guide and request the source records relevant to your purchase.

Review evidence and acquisition cost reconciliation

Use this example alongside the complete review library. The company-published story and tracker fields are selected evidence, not independent verification of typical results. A forecast needs its own assumptions and dates; a realized result needs records for the same period.

Associated recordListed entry totalDown + closing + designDifference
deal-05$194,247$194,247$0

The difference column checks only the three displayed acquisition components. A zero difference does not prove that every launch cost, service fee or reserve is included. A nonzero difference needs an itemized reconciliation; it is not automatically an error or a corrected investment amount.

Ready to run your numbers? Free strategy call · No obligation
Book a Call

Grab A Time To Speak To See If We Can Help!

Step 1 of 2: Enter your contact details. Next, choose a time for your call.

Having trouble? Use our on-site scheduling page.